News Background

‍
Author: Ronny Mugendi

‍
In a recent report, Denmark's lax Law Commitee proposed taxing unrealized capital gains on cryptocurrency at 42%, starting January 1.2026 This tax rule would apply to all cryptocurrencies purchased since Bitcoin's incepion in 2009. f passed, these crypto assets would be subject to the same tax regulations as traditional investments like stocks and bonds. The government aims to aign crypto taxaion with the existing rules for other asset types, such as stocks and bonds.

‍
This new tax policy would affect all cryptocurrency acquired since the first Bitcoin block in 2009. This means any cryptocurrency holders would face a 42% tax on unrealized gains, regardless of whether they have sold the assets.
Tax Minister Rasmus Stoklund supports the proposal, stating: "in recent years, some crypto investors in Denmark have faced heavy taxburdens. Therefore, l am pleased the Tax Law Committee presented detaled new recommendalions today, These recommendations coudprovide a reference for establishing a more reasonable taxation system for crypto investments.”

Regulatory challenges and Investor lmpact

Introducing this crypto tax would address the complexities of taxing crypto assets. The decentraized nature of cryptocurrency makes taxation challenging for both tax authorities and holders. To address these issues, Denmark plans additional regulatory measures.
From 2027. Denmark will begin exchanging data interaionally on Danish crvpto investors. in early 2025, they plan to propose legislationequiring crypto service providers to report client transacions. This will help Denmark monitor aproximately 300.000 crypto investors andprevent potentialtax evasion.
The government also plans to allow investors to offset losses in one cryptocurrency against gains in another. Additionally, crypto losses caroiset gains in financial contracts, correcting an asymmetry in the current tax system, which taxes investor gains more heavily.
These developments align with ltaly's efforts to strengthen control over digital assets. Recently, ltaly announced plans to increase its capitalgalins tax on crypto currencies from 26%6 to 42%6, as par ot broader measures to generate government revenue from cryptocurrency investment gains.

‍
FinTax Commentary

‍
Although the tax proposal has not been formally submitted to Pariament, the tax philosophy and policy direction behind it are worh noting for crvpto holders and industry players, Counties, regardless of whether they set separate capital gains taxes, consider capital gains an essential taxation target under income tax. in practice, some countries (like Singapore and Hong Kong) set capital gains tax rates at 0% to attraciinancial capital. Countries with non-zero rates often only tax capital gains upon "realization," which stresses the conversion of paper profits into actual profts. Regarding crypto capital gains, most countries follow this same approach. Even among academics and policy researchersfocused on cryptocurrency, few advocate for taxing unrealized crypto gains. This context makes Denmark's proposal appear paricularh'unusua" and distinctive.
Despite its uniqueness, this tax proposal can still be understood from two perspectives: its accompanying measures and its poicy obiectivesFirst, taxing unrealized capital gains on crypto is not an isolated tax measure but is introduced alongside a crypto loss-ofseting mechanism.The Tax Law Commitee also recommends allowing investors to offset crypto losses against gains, which would effectively lower the 42% taxburden. Second, this tax proposal aligns with Denmark's recent policies to strengthen crypto regulation. The decentraized nature of cryptoposes new challenges to tax administraion. Taxing unrealized gains would simpify the tax administration process and represents a crucial step for the government in intensifying crypto regulation.

‍

Denmark's financial system, known for its development and stabiity, especially efficient banking services and risk management, has made it anintegral part of the global financial system. The Tax Law Commitee's proposal to tax unrealized crypto gains could be seen as an innovativeexperiment in crypto taxation, both benefting government revenue and showing Denmark's commitment to acively managing digital assets. talso contributes to Denmark's efforts to establish a comprehensive crypto tax system.
The challenge remains, however. Although taxing unrealized capital gains would simplify crypto tax administration, the inherent anonymity andborderless nature of cryptocurrencies will continue to pose signlicant chalenges for Denmanrk's tax authorties and may even increase theiworkload. Additionally, inherent drawbacks of taxing unrealized gains, such as creating liquidity issues for investors and potentialy distoringong-term investment decisions, will still be dificult hurdles for the Danish government
In summary, if Denmark implements this tax proposal and retroactively taxes unrealized capital gains in cryptocurrency, it would set a groundbreaking precedent. The far-reaching impact of this measure and whether other countries might folow suit remains to be seen.